Adsense

Pages

Sunday, 25 January 2015

tennis Star Eugenie Bouchard Finds Twirl

Asked To ‘Twirl’: Tennis Star Eugenie Bouchard Finds Twirl Controversy ‘Funny’

An Australian TV reporter asked tennis star Eugenie Bouchard to do a twirl at the Australian Open, and it set off a firestorm of criticism. But Bouchard has come forward saying she didn’t have a problem with twirling for the cameras.
According to the Associated Press, via Fox News, the reporter asked Bouchard to do a twirl so she can show off a new dress. Bouchard did so, and then laughed and seemed to be embarrassed by the incident. Bouchard later described how she felt about the incident.
“It was very unexpected.”
But the question received quite a bit of criticism online, with many finding it to be sexist. One of those was former tennis player Billie Jean King, who expressed her feelings toward the issue on both of her social media accounts.
pic.twitter.com/lTpscjXaTL
— Billie Jean King (@BillieJeanKing) January 22, 2015
According to USA Today, the 20-year-old Bouchard addressed the incident to reporters, saying she wasn’t upset about being asked to twirl.
“I stay out of this stuff. I’m fine with being asked to twirl if they’re going to ask the guys to flex their muscles and stuff.”
Eugenie Bouchard added that she’s going to move on from the incident and work on something that is more important to her.
“Personally, I’m not offended. No, I think it was an in-the-moment thing and it was funny. Yeah, I mean, it’s funny how it’s taken (on) a life of its own. I’m just going to focus on my tennis.”
Bouchard went through a similar situation last year, when a different reporter asked her which celebrity she had an interest in dating. Her response was Justin Bieber, which drew controversy itself. But the question seemed to receive more controversy and was also deemed to be sexist.
Eugenie Bouchard reiterated that the “twirl” question didn’t bother her, and neither did the one about which celebrity she’d date.
“[Reporters] try to ask funny questions. It’s entertaining, I guess. I don’t mind it. People can think what they want about it, but I just answer how I want and do what I want. I’m fine with it.”
However, Eugenie Bouchard wants people to take an interest in more important things about her, such as how she has done at the Australian Open.
“I’m happy that I’ve played three solid matches here, and we could definitely be a little more focused on that.”
Do you find it sexist that Eugenie Bouchard was asked to twirl?

Bill Belichick's excuses in DeflateGate are lame but show funny side of Patriots coach, even if it was unintentional

Bill Belichick's excuses in DeflateGate are lame but show funny side of Patriots coach, even if it was unintentional

It might have been the funniest thing Bill Belichick has said in 40 years coaching professional football, but he didn’t even crack a smile.
As Prof. Belichick was giving his lengthy dissertation Saturday on the physics of the NFL football — if he was actually a college professor, all the kids would fall asleep in class or be shopping on their laptops — and detailed how the Patriots did nothing wrong in DeflateGate, he made a point of how much he’s learned this week that he didn’t know about The Duke, and probably never wanted to know.
“I’m embarrassed to talk about the amount of time I’ve put into this relative to the other important challenge in front of us,” he said. “I’m not a scientist. I’m not an expert in footballs. I’m not an expert in football measurements. I’m just telling you what I know.”
You want to dissect blitz schemes or stopping Russell Wilson and the read option in Super Bowl XLIX or playing unorthodox four-man offensive lines and the philosophy of going for it on fourth down, Belichick is your guy, maybe the best coach in NFL history.
LUPICA: CAN'T CONVICT PATRIOTS YET
But pounds per square inch relating to footballs and DeflateGate is not his thing. “I would not say I’m Mona Lisa Vito of the football world as she was in the car expertise area, alright,” Belichick said, referring to the girlfriend in My Cousin Vinny.
Now that was funny. Maybe Rex Ryan rubbed off on him.
Belichick spent the entire week doing experiments with footballs in practice and simulating how the Patriots get them ready for games. It’s all about texture and the laces and the proper feel for Tom Brady, it’s not about the air pressure. Here were the conclusions he was eager to share at an impromptu news conference in Foxborough: After a thorough internal investigation and pigskin experimentation, the Patriots are innocent. They did nothing wrong.
Miss Vito, your witness.
“I believe now 100% that I have personally and we have as an organization followed every rule to the letter,” Belichick said. He added, “At no time was there any intent whatsoever to try to compromise the integrity of the game or to gain an advantage.”
Okay, well, let’s call off the NFL investigation and let’s go play Super Bowl XLIX.
Not so fast.
The grey hoodie was trying to distance himself and his team as far as possible from DeflateGate as it prepares to head to Phoenix on Monday for what’s going to be a crazy Super Bowl week. This story is not going away, not after the NFL hired Ted Wells to help out league VP Jeff Pash to figure out if the Pats cheated again.
Before bringing in Wells, the NFL conducted nearly 40 interviews without coming up with the mastermind of the deflated footballs. Goodell is going to have a tough call if the Wells report turns up nothing. Football fans are starved for Belichick and the Pats, the Evil Empire, to be punished. But if this turns out to be nothing more than an atmospheric phenomenon, then what will Goodell do? Some answer must be provided for why the Patriots footballs were deflated, but it certainly won’t come this week and overshadow the game more than it is already.
The footballs are supposed to be inflated between 12.5 psi-13.5 psi. “When the footballs were delivered to the officials’ locker room, the officials were asked to inflate them to 12.5 psi,” Belichick said. “What they exactly did, I don’t know.”
Was he pushing the blame off to referee Walt Anderson and his crew? This is getting really tricky.
If history is a guide, Wells will not be issuing his report any time soon. He was hired by the NFL last year to conduct the BullyGate investigation on Nov. 6. He issued his report on Feb. 14. See you in March or April, probably on a Friday at 5 p.m.
Belichick actually sounded credible Saturday, just as he did Thursday. The problem is after the SpyGate fiasco of 2007, Belichick’s credibility is not quite there with Tom Coughlin’s. Tom Brady looked uncomfortable and a little nervous Thursday, facing 61 questions in 30 minutes, but he has a lot of good will stored up and has earned the benefit of the doubt except from former players now on television who are intent in making a name for themselves by calling him a liar.
Belichick gets no benefit of the doubt, even if he’s now set a record with his sixth Super Bowl appearance as a head coach. The league gets no benefit of the doubt, either, after the botched Ray Rice investigation. So, you have the Patriots investigating themselves and finding nothing wrong and the first week of the league’s investigation, with nearly 40 interviews conducted, also turning up nothing.
And that does nothing to change the narrative for Super Bowl week. It will be all DeflateGate, all the time, even though Belichick said he’s done talking about it. He did go into great detail how the Patriots simulated game-day conditions this week preparing the football, saw how different conditions could impact the air pressure, says it’s all about texture and feel and not PSIs, but insists once the footballs were turned over to the referee before the game, that’s the last of it. He said the Patriots never touched them again except in the game.
Belichick says he is extra careful to stay on the right side of the rules, but still rationalized SpyGate on Saturday, even though the NFL had sent out strict instructions that taping defensive signals was against the rules. He said the signals were “in front of 80,000 people, okay? So we filmed him taking signals out in front of 80,000 people, like there were a lot other teams doing at the same time, too. Forget about that. If we were wrong, then we’ve been disciplined for that.”
Wonder how Miss Vito would have handled that one.

Akshay is brutal yet funny in Neeraj Pandey's gory film

Akshay is brutal yet funny in Neeraj Pandey's gory film

Baby begins with the a man tied to a chair, being punched to pulp. It goes on and on, and on. That, ladies and gentleman, is roughly what director Neeraj Pandey and his cast of testosterone-fuelled patriots will do to logic and common sense over the course of nearly three hours, in Baby.
Starring Akshay Kumar, his stick-on moustache and Danny Denzongpa's voice, Baby is about a super-secret and incredibly effective anti terrorism cell that was set up after the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, better known as "26/11". You are, of course, meant to notice there's nothing babyish about muscled men hunting down bad guys. However, after seeing how the Baby gang go around making a mess — cafes in Istanbul are destroyed, hotel rooms in Kathmandu are trashed — look tremendously chuffed once they're done and calmly move on, leaving the government of India to clean up and pay for the mess presumably, Baby seems to be a very apt name for this unit.
Five years after its setup, Baby is the Indian government's most lethal weapon against terrorism. Feroze Ali Khan (Danny Denzongpa) is the moustachioed government servant who heads up this elite unit and yet is stupid enough to stand at an open balcony and chat about Baby's latest mission. In the real world, men like Feroze live closely-guarded lives and even then are often unable to evade bullets. Fortunately for Feroze, the terrorists in Baby are mostly idiots, which is why he can saunter about freely. They don't know how to evade CCTV or hide their virtual footprints, their skills at making bomb triggers is highly suspect, and they don't seem to be particularly good at keeping an eye on their young recruits.
Courtesy: Facebook
Courtesy: Facebook

Baby starts off in Istanbul, where Ajay (Akshay Kumar) has the task of catching a double agent who knows the details of an impending bomb blast in Delhi. Ajay is able to do so by pummelling the double agent. Before killing himself, the double agent tells Ajay that Baby may have stopped this blast, but there are many Diwalis planned this year.
Clearly, no one in Baby has got the memo that torture doesn't actually work and if painful abuse does make someone talk, it's likely to be whatever the interrogator wants to hear. However, Baby is not realistic even though it does claim to be inspired by reality. This is amply proven by how reliable Ajay's international roaming network is. (Since Madhurima Tuli plays Ajay's wife in Baby and continues to have the same problem of being home while her hardworking husband is away, maybe it's Airtel?)
Back in India, the much-wanted terrorist Bilal Khan (Kay Kay Menon) is not happy that he's rotting in a humble jail cell while small fry like Kasab get air conditioned accommodation. Looking at Bilal's perfect blow dry and contact lenses, it looks like he's scored one over Kasab by getting a personal stylist in jail. Still, that's not enough for him and his grumblings swiftly reach the ears of Mullah Maulana Mohammed (Rasheed Naz), who lives in "border areas". The Mullah hates India but has enough strings in faraway Mumbai to ensure Bilal is able to escape while leaving court by killing three policemen and crashing one police van and a jeep. On Mumbai's Marine Drive. These terrorists are nothing if not subtle.
Ajay learns that another terrorist they'd thought was dead is actually thriving as a travel agent in Kathmandu and is in touch with Bilal who has disappeared since giving Mumbai police the middle finger salute. A quick trip to Kathmandu is organised and Ajay learns Bilal has gone into hiding in Saudi Arabia. So now our intrepid hero heads for the deserts of the Middle East, accompanied by Shuklaji (Anupam Kher and an unnecessary wig) and Groot, sorry Jai (Rana Dagubatti). There's a shower curtain in Baby that gets more screen time than Dagubatti does. However, the actor does do something that few have managed: bulked up and enormous, he makes Kumar look puny.
There are a couple of twists in Baby, but all of it is predictable. Despite that, Baby holds one's attention for most of its running time. Pandey deserves praise for how he's made Kumar shed melodrama and instead play the cool, unflappable agent. Kumar is both funny and brutal as Ajay, reminding us that even the worst of acting talent can seem passable in the hands of a clever director.
More than Kumar, though, what keeps Baby tense are the superbly executed action sequences that follow one another at breakneck speed. Perhaps Pandey was hoping that the chases and punches would distract audiences from noticing the enormous lapses in logic and how lazily the script deals with plot holes. This is particularly evident in the latter half of the film, when Deep Asset Ashfaq (Mikaal Zulfiqar) enters the story and is the answer to pretty much every problem that Ajay faces. Need a cover in Saudi Arabia? Or a hotel booking, a car, a way through Saudi Arabian bureacracy, a band-aid? We have Deep Asset Ashfaq to do the needful. From travel agent to intelligence gatherer, driver and general eye candy, he's doing it all. Considering how much Ashfaq manages by the end of Baby, you'd think he's the real hero, rather than Ajay who spends his screen time jumping, punching and on one occasion, leaving his DNA behind.
Baby's chest-thumping glorification of violence is intensely disturbing, particularly when you watch the film with people who giggle at the sound of words like "ch*tiya" (uncaring of the fact that this is not being said as a joke) and cheer when Ajay, for no reason, slams a man so hard that he dislodges a tooth in his victim. When the bleeding man points out that he's cooperated with Ajay and didn't deserve to be hit, Ajay's response is "Aadat hai" [It's a habit]. The audience erupted in laughter and applause. Apparently, it's reassuring to us that people with uncontrollable lust for violence are out there, supposedly keeping us safe by lashing out unnecessarily.
The most appalling and laughable twisting of fact in Baby has to be the way Pandey casts Saudi Arabia in the global terror drama. The country has and continues to fund some of the most notorious and violent extremist organisations and if Saudi money stopped supporting Islamist terrorist agencies, it's fair to argue a lot of threats would be rendered toothless. In Baby, however, the Saudi law enforcement turns a blind eye to an Islamic radical being smuggled out by three foreigners who have killed a terrorist last seen hugging sheikhs. That's about as likely as the possibility of Kumar growing a real moustache to become Ajay.
Then again, maybe it's not Saudi Arabia behaving out of character. After all, we had the rather dishy Deep Asset Ashfaq over there and from the look of things, that man can do anything.
While Baby is not a bad film, particularly by Bollywood standards, it is manipulative, ill-informed and lazily written. Its admiration and advocacy of violence is juvenile at best and irresponsible at worst. That said, Pandey, who is credited with story, script and direction, did have the good sense to show us that not all Muslims are terrorists, whether in India or anywhere else. For that, we're thankful. He could have pulled a Clint Eastwood on us (see: American Sniper) and we're relieved that he didn't.
However, Baby does go some distance in confirming a different stereotype: that Pakistan makes hotter men than India. You see Mikaal "Deep Asset" Zulfiqar, who makes Dagubatti and Kumar look like wallpaper, is a Pakistani actor. Ladies (and gentlemen so inclined), you may now go hunting for him on Zindagi.

Thursday, 22 January 2015

Chukht-

Chukht-
Busydه an old house was a sign of poor laborers had _mkan, just tha__ archaeological ruins the poor laborer when his wife comes home early evening innocently says:
"The door of the house lguadyn, how long will it stay behind the curtain hanging ga__
And yes! If the burst is still modest old I am afraid to say, a thief broke into the house "
Smile became husband responds: I did, lives in fear of being forgotten? Do not worry, I'm all agreed threshold _______ "
So many years had passed in such debates, a wife insisted that the door to the house lguadu__
Husband finally had to give in and it was a nice little drazه less fear of wife and husband. Now after labor began to feel secure at home ___
A few years had passed husband died suddenly
And the house lights went out, closing the door to her house all day sitting in the room,
One night a thief entered the house, climbed the wall jump to the woman woke up to the sound, the noise of mcaya.mhly people came, saw and learned that the thief thief neighbor lya.jb _____
Then she realized that the thief did not buy the door, her husband was stronger than this threshold the threshold (husband) ____ did!
But the reality is that a defect in her husband million threshold yهy husband are strong, our married mothers, sisters and daughters should care what they do to posts ____ and thanks to God.

Masti 92

Advertisement

 

Copyright @ 2013 Masti 92.